Thursday, August 31, 2006
Women in Ministry: Last Call
by Surly Dave
Here is the final draft of my position paper on Women in Leadership. I want to thank all the people who challenged, encouraged me, and even disagreed with me.
What you have here is the result of a lot of prayer, study and discussion.
I want to establish from the beginning that I believe that the Church’s ministry to the Church is to Encourage, Equip, and Release.
When I first started researching this paper, I noticed a correlation between the ordaining of women and the embracing of liberal theology:
1. The Methodist Church and the Presbyterian Church-USA (North) began ordaining women in 1956.
2. Presbyterian Church-USA (South) in 1964, (North) in 1969.
3. The ELCA in 1970.
4. The Episcopal Church in 1976.
Today, these denominations are noted for their liberal theology, sinking to the point of ordaining homosexuals, accepting Unitarianism (rejecting the Work of the Cross, everyone gets in), and denying the Bible as God's divinely inspired Word.
At first, I thought that the two issues of women in leadership and rejecting God’s Word went hand in hand, and I felt that the way to stop the encroachment of liberal theology was to keep women out of leadership because allowing them to assume leadership over men seemed to be the ‘beginning of the end’.
Though the last few weeks of prayer, study, and discussion, I have come to the conclusion that the issue isn’t women in leadership, but the spirit by which they got there. The list of churches above began accepting women into leadership not because of a call on peoples lives or a recognition of giftings, but out of a more political sense: Feminism. Once they embraced feminism, there began the downward spiral.
They began rejecting the inerrancy of the Bible, started emasculating men and blurring gender roles, and began questioning the Fatherhood of God. (I’ve seen paintings of ‘female Jesus’ in places where liberal theology has taken root in the Philippines and Guatemala) There are people in these liberal churches encouraging prayer to “God, our Mother”, which opens the door to Earth Goddess religions and the rejection of the Bible all together.
However, I see that in charismatic circles, the ordination of women has not lead down a path of liberalism. Why? It’s because they believe in the inerrancy of the bible, the fatherhood of God, that homosexuality is sin, that men and women where created with different characteristics and roles, that Jesus died on the cross for our sin and to pave away to reconciliation. They also recognize that God calls people and gifts them for ministry, and that you don’t arrive there due to quotas, equal rights, or earning it. It’s not a function of politics.
So to discuss women in leadership is to actually ask, “What are the qualifications for leaders, regardless of gender?”
Titus 1:5-9 5The reason I left you in Crete was that you might straighten out what was left unfinished and appoint elders in every town, as I directed you. 6An elder must be blameless, the husband of but one wife, a man whose children believe and are not open to the charge of being wild and disobedient. 7Since an overseer is entrusted with God's work, he must be blameless—not overbearing, not quick-tempered, not given to drunkenness, not violent, not pursuing dishonest gain. 8Rather he must be hospitable, one who loves what is good, who is self-controlled, upright, holy and disciplined. 9He must hold firmly to the trustworthy message as it has been taught, so that he can encourage others by sound doctrine and refute those who oppose it.
When it comes to selecting elders and pastors for the Church, the Bible gives us a clear list of character traits a leader must have: must be blameless, one spouse (This is the only rewording of scripture that I will use), their children believe and are not open to the charge of being wild and disobedient, blameless—not overbearing, not quick-tempered, not given to drunkenness, not violent, not pursuing dishonest gain, must be hospitable, one who loves what is good, who is self-controlled, upright, holy and disciplined.
Their lives are already baring bearing fruit consistent with the call.
There is also a call to “hold firmly to the trustworthy message as it has been taught, so that he can encourage others by sound doctrine and refute those who oppose it.” One of the biggest challenges the Church faces today is being swallowed up by the world around. We can’t embrace the world and embrace the cross. So even though the world is trying to tell us what to believe, that our doctrine is wrong, that something is wrong with the church because we won’t accept the world, we must stand on the Word of God and live our lives in the shadow of the Cross.
I believe that the ‘sound doctrine’ aspect of choosing an elder or pastor must include, but not limited to :
1. The belief the Bible is God's divinely inspired Word, revealed to mankind (2 Tim. 3:16)
2. The belief that the fullness of God came to earth and lived in the human body of Jesus Christ of Nazareth 2,000 years ago (Col. 1:19).
3. The belief that believing in (John 3:15-19, 5:24), and obeying (Luke 8:21, John 3:20, John 14:21, 23-24) Jesus Christ is the only way to have eternal life or to be reunited with God (Acts 4:10-12).
4. The beliefs that God created men and women with different characteristics and roles that compliement each other.
5. The belief that homosexuality is a sin and not an acceptable lifestyle. (Romans 1:24-27)
6. An acknowledgement of the Fatherhood of God.
Really, if someone has issue with any of these basic Biblical believes, I can not accept them as a leader.
To summarize:
1. A leader’s life must bare bear fruit consistent with the call prior to the call.
2. That call needs to be confirmed by others.
3. There needs to be an acceptance of basic Biblical beliefs.
Blessings,
Dave
Wednesday, August 30, 2006
Jesus Junk
by Surly Dave
As my more loyal readers know (both of you), I'm appalled at Christian Marketing. Today I stumbled across this post: "Jesus Junk" over at Sharper Iron.
He addresses three concerns: Many people trust that wearing Jesus Junk will result in conversions, Christians seem to believe Jesus Junk promotes Christian community, and people seem to be in the business because of pure commercialism.
Now, I have to admit that there have been times when I thought about taking advantage of some of my more gullible brothers and sisters. I've considered marketing the "Martin Luther Home Brew Kit" (TM) and the Redeeming Cross Crystal Ashtray. Of course, there is always the Sanctified Check Book Covers, Holy Oil Markers, and Olive Branch Bird Seed (Dove Mix).
Actually, I haven't ruled out the home brew kit yet.
It's a good read. Check it out.
Christian Marketing
Tuesday, August 29, 2006
Just when I was ready to mock some commies...
by Surly Dave
Went over to Amy Klobuchars sight to see if there was anything that needed mocking on the " 101 Reasons to Whine Change" only to discover its gone!
Darn. I like commie bashing.
Commies
Mike Hatch: It's Okay for Kids to have Sex, Just Don't Watch it in Video Games
by Surly Dave
Let's see...Mike Hatch didn't raise any stink about the over the counter "Morning After Pill". By nature of who he hangs out with (Democrats), he's probably for making it available to all regardless of age.
So...The judge throws out Minnesota's video game law.(Mike plans to waste tons more tax payers money appeal) The law was supposed to keep kids from getting their hands on violent and sexually explicit video games.
Therefore...It okay for kids to have sex, but they can't watch it in video games.
Mike Hatch, Minnesota Politics
Monday, August 28, 2006
Pop Culture Reference:
by Surly Dave
"Snakes in the Drain"
Can you guess what I had to do this afternoon?
Hezbollah Head: "Whoa! Didn't see that coming."
by Surly Dave
Another Sporting Event Nobody Cares About:
by Surly Dave
U.S. Open Begins Today in New York
*** yawn***
Kind of like the Soccer World Cup.
U.S. Open
Sunday, August 27, 2006
Plan Crash is Bush's Fault.
by Surly Dave
Yup. Read it on the Craigslist Politics message board that the reason the plane crashed down south was because of all the attention and money being poured into Iraq by Bush.
If hurricane Ernesto comes anywhere near New Orleans, you know whose to blame.
Friday, August 25, 2006
Tough Question: Women in Leadership
by Surly Dave
This is the rough draft of my position paper on "The Roles of Men and Women in Church Leadership". It's long. It's heady. Probably the most scholarly thing I've written since attending college. And to be honest, I'll probably become one of the least popular people in my church. But my intention is to follow Jesus, and I believe the Bible is God's divinely inspired word, so that is where I find my peace.
While this is a position paper on biblical views of women in ministry, a couple of statements regarding the biblical role of men and women in general must be addressed. This is from the Danvers Statement, compiled by the Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood (CBMW).
1. Both Adam and Eve were created in God's image, equal before God as persons and distinct in their manhood and womanhood (Gen 1:26-27, 2:18).
2. Distinctions in masculine and feminine roles are ordained by God as part of the created order, and should find an echo in every human heart (Gen 2:18, 21-24; 1 Cor 11:7-9; 1 Tim 2:12-14).
3. Adam's headship in marriage was established by God before the Fall, and was not a result of sin (Gen 2:16-18, 21-24, 3:1-13; 1 Cor 11:7-9).
4. The Fall introduced distortions into the relationships between men and women (Gen 3:1-7, 12, 16).
o In the home, the husband's loving, humble headship tends to be replaced by domination or passivity; the wife's intelligent, willing submission tends to be replaced by usurpation or servility.
o In the church, sin inclines men toward a worldly love of power or an abdication of spiritual responsibility, and inclines women to resist limitations on their roles or to neglect the use of their gifts in appropriate ministries.
5. The Old Testament, as well as the New Testament, manifests the equally high value and dignity which God attached to the roles of both men and women (Gen 1:26-27, 2:18; Gal 3:28). Both Old and New Testaments also affirm the principle of male headship in the family and in the covenant community (Gen 2:18; Eph 5:21-33; Col 3:18-19; 1 Tim 2:11-15).
6. Redemption in Christ aims at removing the distortions introduced by the curse.
o In the family, husbands should forsake harsh or selfish leadership and grow in love and care for their wives; wives should forsake resistance to their husbands' authority and grow in willing, joyful submission to their husbands' leadership (Eph 5:21-33; Col 3:18-19; Tit 2:3-5; 1 Pet 3:1-7).
o In the church, redemption in Christ gives men and women an equal share in the blessings of salvation; nevertheless, some governing and teaching roles within the church are restricted to men (Gal 3:28; 1 Cor 11:2-16; 1 Tim 2:11-15).
7. In all of life Christ is the supreme authority and guide for men and women, so that no earthly submission-domestic, religious, or civil-ever implies a mandate to follow a human authority into sin (Dan 3:10-18; Acts 4:19-20, 5:27-29; 1 Pet 3:1-2).
8. In both men and women a heartfelt sense of call to ministry should never be used to set aside Biblical criteria for particular ministries (1 Tim 2:11-15, 3:1-13; Tit 1:5-9). Rather, Biblical teaching should remain the authority for testing our subjective discernment of God's will.
9. With half the world's population outside the reach of indigenous evangelism; with countless other lost people in those societies that have heard the gospel; with the stresses and miseries of sickness, malnutrition, homelessness, illiteracy, ignorance, aging, addiction, crime, incarceration, neuroses, and loneliness, no man or woman who feels a passion from God to make His grace known in word and deed need ever live without a fulfilling ministry for the glory of Christ and the good of this fallen world (1 Cor 12:7-21).
10. We are convinced that a denial or neglect of these principles will lead to increasingly destructive consequences in our families, our churches, and the culture at large.
The bible teaches clear roles for men and women in the home and in the church. While I don’t want to see anyone excluded from walking out the call that God has places on their life, that call will be fulfilled and walked out with in the confines of the written word.
I think that placing a woman into leadership in order to "make a statement" about one's church, to meet some type of master plan or quota, or to equalize some supposed "power structure" in the church is a mistake. We should also beware of placing anyone into leadership just because, “Well, they deserve it.” We should not place anyone into leadership to satisfy a sense of moral responsibility: man or woman.
After much prayer and study, examining both the egalitarian and complimentarian views, I believe that biblically, women are to be excluded from the leadership positions of pastor and elder.
1 Timothy 2:11-14 11A woman should learn in quietness and full submission. 12I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man; she must be silent. 13For Adam was formed first, then Eve. 14And Adam was not the one deceived; it was the woman who was deceived and became a sinner.
In 1 Timothy, it is often argued that Paul was not allowing women to teach because the women where teaching heresy. Paul doesn’t address any particular heresy, and he would have, as evidenced by the fact that he addressed gossiping in 1 Tim 5:13.
An other argument is that the women of the time where uneducated and lacked basic understanding of scripture. Actually, Ephesus was a cultural center with many educated men and women.
One of the women brought forth as an example of women in leadership is Priscilla. Priscilla was from the church at Ephesus, and the directive applied to her as well. Yes, Priscilla and Aquila helped instruct Apollos in the word that they learned from 3 years of tutelage from Paul (Acts 18:26), but it is never implied that she was a elder or pastor in the church, or taught in church.
The reason Paul gave this directive is because isn’t because of anything happening in Ephesus, but because of what happened in Genesis: 1 Tim 2 13For Adam was formed first, then Eve. 14And Adam was not the one deceived; it was the woman who was deceived and became a sinner.
So even though there where women who learned directly from Paul, they weren’t allowed to have authority or teach.
1 Corinthians 14:33-36 As in all the congregations of the saints, 34women should remain silent in the churches. They are not allowed to speak, but must be in submission, as the Law says. 35If they want to inquire about something, they should ask their own husbands at home; for it is disgraceful for a woman to speak in the church. 36Did the word of God originate with you? Or are you the only people it has reached?
1 Corinthians 11:5, Paul clearly allows women to pray and prophesy in church. Prophesy is not scripture, and doesn’t have more authority than scripture: It’s reporting something that God spontaneously brings to mind. Ultimately, Elders and Pastors are to judge the word, especially words of direction to the church.
Both 1 Timothy 2:11-14 and 1 Corinthians 11:5 show that Paul was consistent in the way he applied this principle.
Requirements for elders are set forth in 1 Timothy 3:1-7 and Titus 1:5-9.
1 Timothy 3:1-7 1Here is a trustworthy saying: If anyone sets his heart on being an overseer,[a] he desires a noble task. 2Now the overseer must be above reproach, the husband of but one wife, temperate, self-controlled, respectable, hospitable, able to teach, 3not given to drunkenness, not violent but gentle, not quarrelsome, not a lover of money. 4He must manage his own family well and see that his children obey him with proper respect. 5(If anyone does not know how to manage his own family, how can he take care of God's church?) 6He must not be a recent convert, or he may become conceited and fall under the same judgment as the devil. 7He must also have a good reputation with outsiders, so that he will not fall into disgrace and into the devil's trap.
Titus 1:5-9 5The reason I left you in Crete was that you might straighten out what was left unfinished and appoint[a] elders in every town, as I directed you. 6An elder must be blameless, the husband of but one wife, a man whose children believe and are not open to the charge of being wild and disobedient. 7Since an overseer[b] is entrusted with God's work, he must be blameless—not overbearing, not quick-tempered, not given to drunkenness, not violent, not pursuing dishonest gain. 8Rather he must be hospitable, one who loves what is good, who is self-controlled, upright, holy and disciplined. 9He must hold firmly to the trustworthy message as it has been taught, so that he can encourage others by sound doctrine and refute those who oppose it.
These directives were given to two different churches, in two different cultural contexts, showing once again that Paul applied this consistently.
Other examples that God intends men to be the elders/leaders of the church.
1. There were no female Apostles. Some argue that this was because Jesus was respecting the culture of the time. In fact, Jesus often stood against the culture of the time by confronting the Pharisees in public, eating with tax collectors and sinners, healing on the Sabbath. If Jesus wanted to make a point, He did. To say Jesus caved into public opinion is to question his integrity.
2. The leadership through out the bible has been consistently male. Once again, If God wanted to establish women as leaders, he’s had thousands of years.
3. Debra and Hulda were prophetesses, but they always prophesied in private. (Judges 4-5, 2 Kings 22:14-20)
Other arguments:
1. Ministry should be determined by gifting, not by gender. The same Holy Spirit that gave the gifts also inspired the Bible, and the Holy Spirit wouldn’t contradict itself.
2. God is giving a new revelation. Prophesy or revelation is not a greater than God’s written word. We can’t allow ‘new revelation’ to steer us away from the inerrant world of God.
3. The New Testament focuses on servant leadership, so we shouldn’t be hung up on all this ‘authority’ stuff. Jesus was the ultimate example of servant leadership, yet one of establishing factors of his ministry was his authority.
The issue of women in ministry is one that causes tempers to flair, feelings to be hurt, and people to leave. But I think that the real issue behind women in ministry and leadership is one of whether we believe in the inerrancy of scripture or not.
The danger of allowing women into elder/pastor roles is that this often goes hand in hand with rejecting the inerrancy of scripture. In the last fifty years, a number of major denominations have started ordaining women.
1. The Methodist Church and the Presbyterian Church-USA (North) began ordaining women in 1956.
2. Presbyterian Church-USA (South) in 1964.
3. The ELCA in 1970.
4. The Episcopal Church in 1976.
Today, these denominations are noted for their liberal theology, sinking to the point of ordaining homosexuals and endorsing a sinful lifestyle.
Most of the cases for egalitarianism I’ve read take liberty in interpreting scripture to fit what they wish it said. They will take the most obscure possible meaning of a word and skew it to fit their desire, or worse, use it to dismiss the scripture all together. They reject the inerrancy of the Bible.
When we reject male and female roles laid out in the bible, the Fatherhood of God comes into question. I’ve seen paintings of a ‘female Jesus’ in places where liberal theology has taken root. There are people encouraging prayer to “God, our Mother”, which opens the door to Earth Goddess religions and the rejection of the Bible all together. The only way we can say, “That will never happen to us” is if we stand on God’s written word: the Bible.
Some might say I’m being defeatist, jumping to conclusions, chauvinistic, fundamentalist…so on. I believe the Bible is the True word of God, and that His Word lays out the proper roles of Men and Women in church and in the home.
Christianity, Church, Complimentarian,
Thursday, August 24, 2006
Church in Transistion: Tough Questions
by Surly Dave
I haven't posted on the transition my church is going through for a while because it's been a process of meetings, questions and discussions. One of the tough questions that has come up is, "What is the role of women in ministry and leadership?"
It's one of those questions that can cause tempers to flare, feeling to be hurt, and people to leave.
Right now, a few of us are are writing position papers on the issue. It's an exercise we went through a few years ago but nothing came of it, and as a result of a couple of hard drives crashing, I can't find my old paper so I'm starting over.
Smarter men (and women) have dug into this issue than I, so I have been reading " Recovering Biblical Manhood and Womanhood: A Response to Evangelical Feminism" by John Piper and Wayne Grudem. They take the unpopular ' Complementarian' view.
I have also spent a lot of time reading through an article by " Christians for Biblical Equality": Men, Women, and Biblical Equality, which takes the egalitarian point of view.
Through prayer and study, I've become a "modified complimentarian". There are prescribed roles for women and men, neither is better than the other, both stand equally before the cross, mutual submission, ect...If you're familiar with the issue, you know what I'm talking about.
I don't have a problem with woman in ministry. Let them teach, preach, pray, prophesie (if your into that), do Sunday School and so on. The Harvest shouldn't turn away workers.
As long as they are submitted to a man.
See, I can't reconcile women in leadership roles as elders and pastors.
The critical verse for me is 1 Cor 11:3 "Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God" (Read whole Chapter here to see the context).
The verse clearly states that man is the head of woman. I know that people try to interpet this as being a result of the culture and Paul trying to do this or that, but those are people who assume that Paul was trying to oppress women. I don't see this at all because Paul commends women in ministry in some of his other writings.
My view of this is that woman aren't oppressed, but doubly blessed. They not only have the coverage of Christ, but they also have the coverage of their husbands. While Eve was first to take the apple, Adam was the one who was upbraided by God, and when the fall is discussed in the bible, Adam bares the blame.
More on this later.
Christianity
Wednesday, August 23, 2006
Before I go, Bogus Doug is Clearly off his F@#$ing Meds.
by Surly Dave
Before I go, Bogus Doug is clearly off his f@#$ing meds. Either that, or his wife has taken over his blog.
Just kidding about the wife part.
Must. Get. Out. Of. House. NOW!
by Surly Dave
Must leave the house today. All this internet job searching is driving me nuts. I need sun and air, human interaction. Taking my lead from Triple A:
Wait! Nobody will want to interact with me if I'm a cranky bear. I think I'll use this picture instead:
A happy bear. Must of just ate someone.
Tuesday, August 22, 2006
Is this funny or sad?
by Surly Dave
I'm not sure what to think about this.
Modern Music Declares Bob Dylan "Obsolete"
by Surly Dave
Dylan says modern recordings "atrocious", while anyone who has heard any of Dylan's recent crooning has declared him obsolete.
Bob, you had your run. You made great contributions to music and culture. But your voice is gone and you're changing your songs because you can't sing them the way you wrote them. You haven't written anything 'vital' in quite away. Time to rap 'er up and become the lovin' grandpa of modern music. Before you become the Jimmy Carter of modern music.
Unemployed: Day 9
by Surly Dave
I've been spending all my days doing resumes and looking for work, so I haven't had much chance to post on world politics, faith, family, and so on. But in our thriving economy, the job thing should take care of it's self soon.
I hope.
A Pack O' Lips
by Surly Dave
Today was supposed to be the Apocalypse, according to Iranian wack job Akmadidijad (or what ever). Turns out there was an err in the translation, and today was supposed to "A pack o' lips", and no one is sure what that means.
Thursday, August 17, 2006
Church gives "Sanctuary" to Illegal Alien Activist.
by Surly Dave
Immigrant Takes Refuge in Chicago Church
Look, if this gal was simply an illegal immigrant waiting tables somewhere, whose son happens to be an American citizen, I might be inclined to give her a pass. Unfortunately, she's "...the face of the movement", which puts the Government in a pickle: Do they storm the church Elián González style, or turn their backs.
Revoke the churches tax exempt status for a start. They call allowing an illegal alien to hole up in your church 'civil disobedience': It's still breaking the law. In the spirit of Henry David Thoreau, don't do the crime unless you're willing to do the time.
Unemployed: Day Four
by Surly Dave
You know, the internet is a vast, black hole of crap. There is tons and tons of just plain garbage out there.
Of course, someone might draw that conclusion just by stopping here.
Just sayin'.
Wednesday, August 16, 2006
Unemployed: Day Three
by Surly Dave
Spirits are flagging.
The crew is getting desperate: There seems to be no work on the horizon.
Often times, relieve was found here:
That's right, Häagen-Dazs Coffee Ice Cream, "the finest Brazilian coffee beans are roasted and brewed to perfection, bringing out their rich, complex flavor, then blended with pure, creamy Häagen-Dazs® ice cream."
Hmmm...Häagen-Dazs. Further depressing the crew is this:
Nutrition Facts:
Amount Per Serving
Serving Size: 1/2Cup (106g)
Calories: 270 Calories from Fat: 160
Total Fat 18g 28%
Saturated Fat 11g 55%
Trans Fat 0.5g
Cholesterol 120mg 40%
Sodium 70mg 3%
Total Carbohydrate 21g 7%
Dietary Fiber 0g 0%
Sugars 21g
Protein 5g
Vitamin A 15% Vitamin C 0%
Calcium 15% Iron 0%
The joke is that the ice cream comes in pint containers, not 1/2 cup containers. So there are 4 servings per container. Over a 1000 calories per container. Not what the crew needs to bolster his spirits while he's sitting in front of a computer pounding out resumes.
So, think, think, think.
Okay, 16 ounces in a pint.
Hmmmm...Pint! Like this:
Nutrition Facts
Serving Size 1 Pint (568.0 g)
Amount Per Serving
Calories
210
Calories from Fat
0
% Daily Value*
Total Fat
0.0g
0%
Total Carbohydrates
17.0g
6%
Protein
0.0g
Guinness: The healthy choice when you require 16 ounces of something to sooth your soul!
The crew's spirits are lifted!
Tuesday, August 15, 2006
Books!Books!Books!Books!Books! (Think Monty Python's "Spam" Song)
by Surly Dave
I pretty busy, ya know, trying to find a job and all that stuff. I don't have a lot of time to goof around on the computer all day, but hey! When Van S tags you with a meme, well, what do you do.
1. One book that changed your life:
Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy by Douglas Adams. Just the Trilogy, not the two follow ups. Or the Bible, written by God (okay, by divinely inspired men, but let's not get into that. Hey, I am not trying to put Douglas Adams on the same plane as God! Get over it!)
2. One book you’ve read more than once:
See #1.
3. One book you’d want on a desert island:
SAS Survival Handbook: How to Survive in the Wild, in Any Climate, on Land or at Sea by John Wiseman
4. One book that made you laugh:
Ann Coulter's Godless: The Church of Liberalism
If she where a man, people would think she was hilarious!
5. One book that made you cry:
Why a Daughter Needs a Dad: A Hundred Reasons by Gregor Lang
6. One book you wish had been written:
Hhmmm...Surly Dave's Guide to the Future, written by Surly Dave in 2025 and shipped to Surly Dave in the Present. Only one copy. Complete with winning lottery numbers, Superbowl winners, and best stock picks.
7. One book you wish had never been written:
The Protocols of the Elders of Zion
8. One book you’re currently reading:
The Faces of Forgiveness by Shults and Sandage
9. One book you’ve been meaning to read:
Theology for the Community of God by Stanley J. Grenz
10. Now tag 5 people:
I'd like to tag someone new to the blogosphere: Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Don't forget to link back to me! Otherwise: Leo, Doug Williams (what better way to return from your blogging break than to start of with a meme!) Uncle Ben, and Hugh Hewitt.
Alright, back to the work of finding work.
Monday, August 14, 2006
Live Blogging my Unemployment!
by Surly Dave
Well, having just got out of bed, I figured I'd check out the ol' blogosphere and see what's going on...
Actually, I've spent most of the morning filling out applications and emailing resumes.
But I did have to resist the urge to go golfing.
Friday, August 11, 2006
More Lieberman Butt Kissing
by Surly Dave
Come On!
"Sen. Lieberman's message of independence and bipartisanship is right for our country."
McGavick said he would love to work across the aisle with a newly re-elected Lieberman this winter, although some Washington Republicans may be unhappy with him endorsing a high-profile Democrat over a GOP nominee.
Are we just looking for a lap dog? Is Lieberman supposed to be the GOP's "good liberal"?
Get with it.
If he gets elected, do you think he'll dance for the GOP every time someone says, "We endorsed you!"?
Cut him loose.
Current Affairs
What's all this fawning over Lieberman?
by Surly Dave
Mark Kennedy comes out and endorses Sen. Joe Lieberman (D). Excuse me, but Joe is a world class leftie. Other than his understanding of national security, the guy is a leftie. Pro-abortion, tax the middle-class to feed the lazy leftie, free medical care for all socialist. Alright? Unless your hoping that he splits the Democrats and helps usher in a conservative Senator, he's a socialist that doesn't need to be in office. Got it? So get off the "I (heart) Lieberman" thing and start looking for a strong conservative to fill the position.
Sheesh.
Breaking Blog Silence!
by Surly Dave
Well, the financially struggling company I was working for let me go this morning. I kind of saw it coming. We had a big "the company is blowing money left and right" meeting on Monday, and I was close to finishing up a big project. Sure enough, I finished the project yesterday, and today: The Ax.
I'm going to focus my job search on sign companies for now. I like the industry, but we'll see. Now that I pretty much have a shop in the garage now, I might see if I can rustle up some 'home work'. Anyone need a sign?
My wife is, understandably, shaken. She doesn't handle this kind of stuff very well. Of course, we don't go through life being prepared for this kind of stuff. You kind of deal with it when it comes along.
So...Off we go! An other adventure!
Monday, August 7, 2006
Riding the "Takin' a Break" Wave
by Surly Dave
I enjoy writing and blogging and all that, but summer is winding down, the evenings are getting shorter, and I want to spend more time with family and taking care of Church stuff.
So rather than do it 'half-a**ed', I think I'll just be taking an official break from the Internet for a while.
For those who wish to contact me, I will be checking my email.
Plus, I have a new love:
Did a little sailing this weekend, and now I'm hooked. We're even thinking about buying a sailboat.
Later.
Thursday, August 3, 2006
Prayer for China's 'Brother Z'
by Surly Dave
Normally, I wouldn't forward or post anything like this, but a friend of mine actually knows 'Brother Z', so this comes from a credible source.
China's 'Brother Z': A Christian Hero Needs Our Support
One of China's beloved house-church leaders has been sentenced to seven years in prison. He needs our prayers-and urgent diplomatic intervention.
One of the most prominent leaders of China's underground house-church movement, Zhang Rongliang, has been sentenced to seven and a half years in prison after being charged with "illegal border crossing" and other crimes. According to China Aid Association, Zhang was sentenced last week-ironically, on July 4.
Affectionately known as "Brother Z," Zhang has already spent 12 years in prison since he was secretly baptized in 1969. He was often tortured during those years. He will spend his 56th birthday this week in a Chinese prison cell.
"Chinese authorities need to know that what they are doing to Christian leaders in their country is not hidden from our view."
I met Brother Z when I was in southern China in the year 2000. He does not look like the leader of 10 million Christians. Often wearing unkempt navy trousers and a wrinkled blue shirt, his black hair tousled, he easily blends into the crowd when mingling among the millions in China's Henan province.
But he is no ordinary peasant from Henan. This simple man-who prefers to sit on the floor when meeting with his team-is an apostle who has planted thousands of churches since the early 1970s. Foreign missionaries and Chinese-church workers alike consider him the most influential leader in the church in China.
Like a New Testament apostle, Zhang bears the brand marks of suffering. He has endured beatings with iron rods and bayonets. He was even shocked with an electric cattle prod.
Converted to Christ in 1963 at age 13, Zhang attended covert house churches in rural areas of Henan-where Mao Tse-tung's dreaded Public Security Bureau (PSB) officials were on the lookout for religious "counterrevolutionaries." In 1974, PSB officers handcuffed him and beat him with sticks to force him to reveal information about his Christian activities. His refusal to deny his faith or betray his colleagues landed him in the Xi Hua labor camp for seven years.
Yet like the apostle Paul, Zhang's faith thrived even while he was imprisoned. He was put in charge of a work team and given unusual freedom to move around the camp's outskirts. As a result, he actually planted churches among rural villagers during his detainment.
After Zhang was released from Xi Hua in 1980, he founded the Chinese for Christ movement-a vast network of churches that had grown to an estimated 10 million members by the year 2001. "It is impossible to know the accurate number," Zhang told me. "It's like the census of China. You can never be sure. Even while we are talking here, we are starting churches. The work of God's kingdom is so fast."
Much of this explosive growth has been linked to miracles, Zhang says. In 1993, in one rural county of Henan province, about 15,000 people were added to the church when news spread that a local government official was paralyzed for several hours after he tried to stop Zhang and his team from conducting an evangelistic crusade in a sports arena.
"The man pointed to us and told his deputies to arrest us," Zhang said. "But after that he could not move, and his deputies had to take him to his car even while his arm was still pointing."
Zhang's ministry is marked by an absolute assurance that China will be completely evangelized. Rather than cowering in the face of resistance from the government, he views barriers as opportunities.
Today he faces perhaps one of the greatest barriers ever to face his ministry. Besides being detained in a Chinese prison, he suffers from diabetes. According to China Aid, Zhang's wife and his two sons are seriously concerned for his safety. Bob Fu, president of China Aid, has asked the international Christian community to rally behind Zhang's cause.
"We are deeply disappointed for this extraordinarily harsh verdict, given the fact that Chinese authorities often deny pastors passports and other travel documents to well-known religious leaders," Fu says. "This is another case showing the Chinese government's new tactic of religious persecution in the name of criminal charges."
You can help Brother Z not only by praying for his health but also by contacting Chinese diplomats. Pass this message along to every Christian you know and ask them to call the numbers below. Chinese authorities need to know that what they are doing to Christian leaders in their country is not hidden from our view. Demand Zhang's release and tell them that you are appalled that China would imprison a church leader simply because of his religious beliefs.
You can contact the Chinese embassy in Washington as well as the Chinese consulate in your region of the country. Here are the numbers you should call:
Embassy of the People's Republic of China
2300 Connecticut Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20008
202-328-2500
Chinese Consulate in Chicago: 312-803-0095
Chinese Consulate in Houston: 713-524-0780
Chinese Consulate in Los Angeles: 213-807-8018
Chinese Consulate in New York City: 212-244-9392
Chinese Consulate in San Francisco: 415-674-2940
Christianity, China, Church
|